English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

One of the most prominent aspects of the 2011 conflict in Libya was the overt support, both military and non-military, offered to the Libyan anti-Gaddafi rebels by the States that intervened in the conflict. The present article evaluates the conformity of this support with the rules of jus contra bellum and jus in bello. From a jus contra bellum perspective, support of the Libyan rebels exceeds the ‘necessary measures’ that the intervening States were allowed to take in order to protect the civilian population in the Libyan conflict according to Security Council resolution 1973 (2011). From a jus in bello perspective, instead of iden- tifying possible violations of international humanitarian law during military operations on a case-by-case basis, the article takes a step back and analyses the legality of the support of the rebels as such. In view of the violations of humanitarian rules reportedly committed by the rebels, the continuous support of the rebels constitutes, on behalf of the supporting States, a violation of the customary obligation to ensure respect for international humanitarian law.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

The Illegality of Military Support to Rebels in the Libyan War: Aspects of jus contra bellum and jus in bello