English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A statistical methodology to verify the trueness of an analytical method in the presence of corrigible systematic errors is presented. This protocol enables detection of constant and proportional components of error. By using the data set obtained in the Youden calibration with different sample test portions, the constant component of the error (Youden blank) can be determined. An analysis of covariance was applied to 3 calibration curves established with standard solutions and with standard additions to 2 different sample test portions. The slopes were compared, and the presence of any matrix-analyte interaction was detected. A method for removing the numerical components of systematic errors is proposed: a calculation procedure to obtain a correct analytical result and a statistical test to verify the correctness of analyte contents obtained from different calibrations. For demonstration purposes, the protocol was applied to spectrofluorometric determination of oxalates in spinach leaves.

Chemometric Protocol to Validate an Analytical Method in the Presence of Corrigible Constant and Proportional Systematic Errors