English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most prevalent worldwide cause of congenital abnormalities. Whereas, rubella once claimed that superlative, and Zika is more topical these days, CMV produces fetal infections year after year and all over the world. Although deafness is the most common sequel to congenitally acquired CMV, and it is the cause of approximately 25% of all congenital hearing loss, more serious defects include microcephaly, retinitis, and mental retardation [1, 2]. Not surprisingly, efforts to develop antiviral treatments and vaccine prevention of congenital CMV infection have been going on since the 1970s [3, 4]. The former have had good success in treating infections acquired during immunosuppression incident to transplantation, but they had limited success in treating congenital infection, whereas vaccine development has progressed slowly but with increasing evidence for efficacy. There are now at least 10 vaccines in development, including one now in Phase II trials. Accumulated data from vaccine studies thus far show low to moderate efficacy against acquisition of CMV by seronegative women [5, 6] and impressive efficacy in preventing disease in solid organ transplant recipients [4, 7]. The newer vaccines on trial aim for higher efficacy. Cytomegalovirus is ubiquitous in all populations, but there is an important difference between its epidemiology in developed versus developing countries. In the former, approximately half of women of childbearing age are CMV-seronegative and therefore susceptible to primary infection, whereas in the latter, almost all women have been infected in childhood and are thus seropositive during pregnancies later in life [8]. The indication for a vaccine in seronegative women is clear, but the situation in seropositive women raises controversy, because evidence has accrued that seropositive women can be infected during pregnancy and pass the virus to their fetuses with resultant defects, indicating that natural immunity is not necessarily protective [9]. Therefore, the concern has been raised that if natural immunity is imperfect, how can a vaccine be expected to work? Moreover, modeling estimations suggest that from a worldwide viewpoint, the population of seropositive women who transmit CMV to their fetuses is much larger than that of seronegative women [10]. This controversy has been well described [11], and it acts as a disincentive to investment in a CMV vaccine by manufacturers, although it can be argued that a vaccine that is immunogenic in both seronegative and seropositive women of childbearing age would be indicated everywhere throughout the world. However, to justify the feasibility of a CMV vaccine, the potency of natural immunity with regard to prevention of acquisition and transmission to the fetus is a key issue. With regard to CMV acquisition by pregnant women, the issues of frequency of exposure and challenge dose loom large. Epidemiologic studies suggest that children, particularly toddlers, are often excreting high levels of CMV and are probably the main sources of infection for mothers [12]. Moreover, in countries with high seroprevalence, the frequency of exposure of pregnant women to others carrying CMV is likely high, resulting in many challenges to immunity. That being the case, the important question is how often is maternal immunity to CMV imperfect, or to put it another way, how often are fetuses of CMV seropositive women congenitally infected? With regard to CMV infection in those women, Brazilian studies led by Dr. Maria Mussi-Pinhata have been paramount. In those studies, 35% of women excreted CMV during pregnancy, as the result of reinfection or reactivation [13]. However, the more important questions have been (1) what proportion of those women transmitted CMV to the fetus, and (2) how does that compare to infections in seronegative women? The study by Mussi-Pinhata et al [14] in this issue of the Journal of Infectious Diseases gives some of the first answers to these questions. In this Brazilian population, few women were seronegative when tested E D I T O R I A L C O M M E N T A R Y

the journal of infectious diseases (online. university of chicago press)/the journal of infectious diseases

Seroconversion for Cytomegalovirus Infection During Pregnancy and Fetal Infection in a Highly Seropositive Population: “The BraCHS Study,” by Mussi-Pinhata et al