English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

McGarvey, R., Matthews, J. M., and Feenstra, J. F. 2009. Estimating mortality from times-at-large: testing accuracy and precision using simulated single tag-recovery data. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 573–581. Single tag-recovery data are available for many commercial and recreational fish stocks. However, the use of tag-recovery data has been limited by the unknown proportion of tagged recaptured animals that fishers report back to researchers. Tag underreporting causes underestimation bias in commonly applied Petersen-based estimators of fraction harvested. Using simulated data, we tested the claim that estimates of total instantaneous mortality rate (Z) based on mean time-at-large are unbiased by tag non-reporting, and by short-term (type 1) tag shedding and tag-induced mortality. The Chapman time-at-large estimator produced unbiased estimates of Z. Non-reporting and short-term tag losses produced no detectable bias in estimates of Z. Standard errors of the Chapman Z-estimate decreased with , as predicted. Non-constant-Z scenarios of fishery closure and seasonal cycling gave time-at-large Z-estimates that closely approximated the true population time averages when tag releases were spread evenly across time. Ongoing (type 2) tag shedding and tag-induced mortality biased Z-estimates upwards by the respective ongoing loss rates. When tag-recovery experiments are cut short, accurate estimates of Z are provided by Deemer and Votaw's ‘truncated’ estimator, which had wide standard errors for short experimental length, precision becoming acceptable for tag-recovery experiments run longer than approximately two or three times Z−1.