English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This test was conducted on the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station at Rosemount in corn planted 13 Jun. Two-row plots, 30 ft long with 4 ft alleys, and separated by one skip-row, were arranged in a randomized complete block design. A backpack COa sprayer with two hollow-cone (TX-10) nozzles/row, delivering 25 gal/acre at 33 psi, was used to treat the ear zone of each row. A 5-7 day spray schedule was maintained with the first spray initiated at 20% silk. Treatments were applied 18, 23, 30 Aug, and 6 Sep. Plots were artificially infested with about 25 neonate ECB larvae/ear on 27 Aug. A large natural infestation of CEW also developed. Treatments were evaluated 12 Sep by randomly selecting 25 ears/plot (100/treatment) and recording total ECB and CEW larvae, larval size and location, and feeding damage.

Insecticidal and Microbial Control of Late-Season Insect Pests of Minnesota Sweet Corn, 1991