English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Flysect concentrate containing 0.5% pyrethrin, 1% permethrin, 1.85% PBO and 5.6% of MGK, 11, 264, and 326 was compared to Repel × containing 0.4% pyrethrin, 1% PB, 40% pine oil and 30% kerosene and Repel × original containing 0.4% pyrethrin, 1% PB, 40% pine oil, 50% butoxypoly propylene glycol and 3.6% petroleum hydrocarbon for efficacy against the face fly, stable fly and horn fly on horses. Wipes were diluted 4:1 with water and applied at 4 oz per horse. Untreated horses in the same vicinity were used as controls. Face flies were counted on the faces of each horse, whereas stable flies were counted on the legs of each horse in the treatment. All fly counts were done at —1 day, day of application and at 1, 3, 6, 9 h and 1, 2, 3, and 4 days postapplication. The first 2 preapplication counts were averaged and reported as 0 h count. Each face fly and stable fly treatment was replicated 4 times and the data averaged. One horn fly control test on 3 treated horses and 2 control horses was conducted.

Comparison of Flysect Concentrate, Farnum’s Repel × and Repel × Original Formula Against Flies on Horses, 1985