English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We forward a methodological approach, using model-based cluster analyses, and ambulatory assessments of cognition (2 indicators from each task), to derive subgroups of interest for tailored clinical follow-up in a longitudinal framework. Community dwelling adults were asked to complete 14 consecutive days of ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) using smartphones, including measures of cognitive performance, and self-reported physical and mental health outcomes (e.g., stress, memory complaints, depression, pain). A stable four-cluster solution emerged, labelled as: (1) a high-risk cognitive group (13%; most memory complaints, slowest performing, more memory errors); (2) subjective risk group (42%; highest levels of somatic and cognitive complaints); (3) normative aging (28%; intermediate cognitive performance -- speed/accuracy); (4) super-cognitive agers (17%; fastest speed, best memory). In conclusion, these findings highlight the potential of a cluster-based approach for risk classification, uncovering different profiles of poor performance that may represent different etiologies.

MODEL-BASED CLUSTER ANALYSES OF COGNITION FOR UNPACKING SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES IN PSYCHOSOCIAL OUTCOMES