English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

While preregistration has gained increasing acceptance for quantitative, particularly experimental, studies, its relevance and implementation for qualitative research has only recently been proposed. This presentation provides an overview of the very recent and ongoing debate on the potential benefits and costs of implementing preregistration for qualitative research. The presentation summarizes the debates about whether and how preregistration will lead to greater transparency in qualitative research, explores the implications of preregistration for qualitative research, identifies some of the costs incurred in preregistering qualitative studies, describes the inaccurate assumptions about qualitative research that are repeatedly embedded in calls for preregistration, and identifies some likely, unintended consequences of adopting the same approaches employed or proposed for quantitative studies. Acknowledging the importance of greater transparency and reduced publication bias for all research, including qualitative studies, questions about transparency that qualitative researchers must urgently address are also suggested.

PRE-REGISTERING QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: BENEFITS, UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES, AND UNANSWERED QUESTIONS