English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background\udDuring the past decade a debate has arisen on the possible utility of genomic science for public health purposes. Within this context, we aim to conduct a survey to assess the attitudes of European public health (PH) professionals belonging to EUPHA network regarding their role in the implementation of public health genomics (PHG), and their knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing and the delivery of genetic services.\ud\udMethods\udA pilot on-line survey was conducted on PH professionals that attended EUPHA 2015 Conference’s session on PHG, to ensure practicability, validity and interpretation of the questionnaire. The survey tool is composed of 5 sections: Personal details, Professional activity, Knowledge on genetic testing and delivery of genetic services, Attitudes on genetic testing and delivery of genetic services, Attitudes on the role of public health professionals in PHG.\ud\udResults\ud34 people responded to the questionnaire, mostly female (78,6%) and medical doctors (71,4%). PHG was not addressed during the undergraduate training for any of respondents. Only 35.7% of them correctly identified all evidence-based applications of genetic testing and 42.9% knew all the components of a genetic service. There is no clear-cut opinion on the risk that PHG may divert efforts and resources from addressing social and environmental causes of ill health (42.9% thought it may). Over 85% of respondents thought PHG needs to be grounded on evidence of effectiveness and costeffectiveness. 15 to 21% of respondents disagreed with the proposed roles of PH professionals in PHG. Comments provided to the questionnaire  suggested to simplify the language and rephrase some of the questions in order to increase the number of negative items.\ud\udConclusions\udThis pilot study showed a positive attitude but the need to improve knowledge of PH professionals on PHG. It provided useful input for the implementation of the survey to all members of the EUPHA network.\ud\udKey messages:\ud Public Health Genomics (PHG) is not commonly addressed in undergraduate training and an effort should be made to develop specific curricula on PHG in public health postgraduate training programmes\ud The results of EUPHA’s survey on knowledge and attitudes on PHG will provide a useful background to develop strategies to foster the incorporation of genomics into public health practice in Europ

A pilot survey on knowledge and attitudes of public health professionals on public health genomics