English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We present three cases of active fixation pacemaker lead implantation, where the leads were believed to be inserted in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) septal position, using established radiological criteria. However, when the exact location of the leads was documented by three-dimensional echocardiography, true septal RVOT position was achieved in only one patient. In the other two patients, the leads were, in fact, implanted into the RVOT anterior free wall. The electrocardiogram criteria were not able to identify the septal position from the anterior RVOT free wall position.

Inaccuracy of radiological and ECG criteria for right ventricular outflow tract implantation of pacemaker leads