English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Purpose To evaluate image quality, inter-observer reliability and diagnostic accuracy of self-navigated noncontrast 3D whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) evaluation in comparison to standardized contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA). Methods Whole-heart 1.5 T MRA was performed in 33 patients (aged 84 years [IQR 79–86], 48% male) for aortic root sizing and measurements of coronary ostia heights. A subgroup of 18 (55%) patients underwent additional CTA as gold standard for TAVI measurements. Image quality was assessed by a 4-point Likert scale, continuous MRA and CTA measurements were compared with regression and Bland-Altman analysis, valve sizing by kappa statistics. Results Median image quality of MRA as rated by two observers according was 1.5 [IQR 1.5–2.5]. In 4 patients (12%) one coronary ostium each (right coronary artery 3, left main artery 1) was not clearly definable on MRA. Inter-observer correlation was substantial to excellent (r=0.61 to 0.92) with a bias of 19 mm2 for annulus area (lower limit of agreement −59 mm2, upper limit of agreement 98 mm2; p=0.009). Aortic root and ostia height measurements by MRA and CTA showed substantial to excellent correlation (r=0.65 to 0.90) with no significant bias (all p≥0.333). Mean annulus area for MRA was 414±71 mm2 and for CTA 422±80 mm2 (r=0.9) with a bias of −8 mm2 (lower limit of agreement −79 mm2, upper limit of agreement −62 mm2; p=0.333). Regarding prosthetic valve sizing there was complete consistency between MRA and CTA-based decisions (κ=1). Conclusion Self-navigated noncontrast 3D whole-heart MRA enables reliable aortic root TAVI measurements without significant difference to standardized CTA. Prosthesis sizing by MRA measurements would completely match to CTA-based choice. However, in some cases coronary ostia may be difficult to define. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

european heart journal

Self-navigated MRI 3D whole heart sequence for non-enhanced aortic root measurement in transcatheter aortic valve intervention: comparison to cardiac CT