English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Comparability of lipase catalytic activities was poor when lipase was determined in 50 patients' specimens by a turbidimetric (Boehringer) and a colorimetric (Sigma) assay. Mean values of results differed by a ratio of 2.39. Optimal common conditions were defined for the titration of lipase activity in two commercial calibrators and in a home-purified preparation of human pancreatic lipase (HPL). When using these titers for each calibrator, comparability was greatly improved (ratio = 1.25). This result indicates that a significant part of between-method discrepancy is due to the lack of a reference method for the titration of lipase calibrators. Intermethod behavior of each material was compared with that of patients' specimens. By using HPL as calibrator, comparability was still dramatically improved (ratio = 1.01). This study shows the importance of the validation of a material for defined routine measurement procedures, before its use as calibrator.

Importance of standardization of lipase assays by using appropriate calibrators