English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We investigated the ability of current immunometric methods for thyrotropin (TSH; thyroid-stimulating hormone) to distinguish between low-normal and subnormal hormone concentrations by using the data from an external quality assessment (EQA) survey in 1990. We computed the interassay (between-run) precision profiles from results from 101 laboratories, which used the five most popular kits in the survey; during the control period (one year) each laboratory assayed 4 EQA pools distributed (as hidden replicates) in five occasions. The interassay CV was relatively low (9-13%) for three pools in the normal TSH range (greater than 0.8 milli-int. unit/L) but markedly higher (30-40%, except for one more precise kit) in the subnormal range (0.2 milli-int. unit/L). We calculated the effect of the between-run variability on the diagnostic accuracy (discrimination between normal and subnormal values) for three representative TSH concentrations: 0.2, 0.4, and 0.5 milli-int. unit/L (0.3 milli-int. unit/L was considered the lower normal limit). The three concentrations were reasonably discriminated (P less than or equal to 5%), and only one kit showed a between-run CV less than 18% at 0.2 milli-int. unit/L. For the other four less-precise kits, only the higher TSH value (0.5 milli-int. unit/L) could be classified with an acceptable diagnostic reliability. With the most precise kit, one can distinguish two TSH concentrations in the 0.3-0.5 milli-int. unit/L range that differ by at least 30%; with the other kits, differences greater than 50-60% are needed for reliable discrimination. Thus many laboratories fail to achieve the functional sensitivity of a second-generation assay, even if they use immunometric methods. TSH assays with a better interassay precision in the low concentration range are needed.

clinical chemistry

Interassay Variability of Immunometric Methods for Thyrotropin in an External Quality Assessment Survey: Evidence that Functional Sensitivity is not Always Adequate for Clinical Decisions