English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aim 1 - To compare the current standard of practice to existing guidelines and to make appropriate changes. 2 - To set a clear pathway for referring patients to the ‘hot laparoscopic cholecystectomy’ pathway. 3 - Avoid inappropriate booking for laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for patients who are not fulfilling the criteria of Hot Gall Bladder Pathway. 4 - Avoid unnecessary delay in performing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in patient with Acute Cholecystitis and mild Biliary Pancreatitis. Method It was a retrospective audit of all the patients who underwent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy through Hot Gall Bladder Pathway between 1st February 2019 to 1st March 2020. We screened a total of 134 patients who had been included in this pathway, 36 patient excluded. 1- Acute cholecystitis with no associated organ dysfunction 63 patients 2- Mild Acute Biliary Pancreatitis 35 patients Results Mild Acute Biliary Pancreatitis who underwent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy within index admission or within 2 weeks of diagnosis 69 % (25/35). Acute cholecystitis with no associated organ dysfunction (mild or moderate; Tokyo guideline grade I or II) who underwent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy within week of diagnosis 68.2 % (43/63). Conclusions

14 NICE CG188; Hot Gall Bladder Pathway in Emergency General Surgery - Are We Following the Guidelines?