English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Studies have shown that newsreaders often have a difficult time distinguishing between different article types and, anecdotally, were oblivious to the text cues that news organizations offered to help make the distinctions. Inquiry into how news readers come to conclusions regarding news content is critical in light of the apparent emergence of so-called interpretative journalism stories—pieces that depart from a straightforward objective approach to the news by subjectively analyzing news content. The goal of this study is to empirically assess the degree to which news readers make visual contact with cues signifying article type, usually with the word “analysis” above the headline. Specifically, the eye movement of 250 college-going US news readers was tracked to determine if they cast their gaze on the textual cues used by two major online newspapers to signify article type. Results revealed that news readers infrequently made eye contact with such cues. Findings give rise to questions about the ways that online news is displayed and understood by audiences.

Blink and You Miss it: Measuring News Readers’ Attention to Interpretative Journalism Cues