English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Each day for two weeks, participants described the events that happened to them. For at least four of these events (two positive and two negative), they described its valence, how much they thought the event affected their sense of self, how it influenced how they felt in general, and how important the event was for their future. Multilevel analyses found that people believed that compared to negative events, positive events had a greater influence on the self and feelings in general, and were seen as more important for the future. Such differences were larger on days on which more (vs. fewer) positive events occurred (overall), and they were larger on days on which fewer (vs. more) negative events occurred.. Such differences were larger for people higher in well-being than for those lower in well-being, primarily due to relationships between well-being and perceptions of negative events.

When the good may be stronger than the bad: Perceived influence of daily events on well-being