English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The OpenFOAM computational fluid dynamics code was used to investigate the performance of three combustion models, namely, Muppala, Zimont and Algebraic. The performance characteristics of these models were tested in a fully premixed (stoichiometric) modern, high-performance 4-valve, iso-octane, dual overhead cam (DOHC) engine with quasi-symmetric pent roof combustion chamber running at 1500 revolutions per minute. The performance characteristics of the three combustion models were found to be reasonably representative of measurement data that are usually observed in internal combustion engine test bed experiments. The combined or overall durationof the flame developmentand propagation periodfor the three models were 5.53 ms, 5.69 ms and 6.04 ms for the Muppala, Zimont and Algebraic models, respectively, and these values correspond to 49.75 ◦ CA, 51.175 CA and 54.425  CA which are well within theacceptable degree crank angle range during typical internal combustion engine operations. The maximum pressure with the corresponding degree crank angle positions at which they occur for the Muppala, Zimont and Algebraic models were found to be:andrespectively. Furthermore, the results from the present study show that the flame-development period, was almost identical for the three combustion models, whereas the rapid-burning interval, was almost indistinguishable for the three combustion models up to about the 80% mark of the regress variable. In specific terms, the complete salient findings from this study are summarised in the conclusion section of this study.

Comparative analysis of combustion dynamics using three reaction source models