English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recently, Lutzoni (1997) used a test de? scribed by Rodrigo et al. (1993; hereinafter referred to as the RKB3 test) to compare phylogenies constructed by using ribosomal RNA gene sequences (rDNA) and intergenic transcribed spacer sequences (ITS) from a group of related basidiomycete species. Lut? zoni discussed the relationships amongst the species, but he also commented exten? sively on the RKB3 tests, particularly on a presumptive bias in the method and a pro? posed workaround. Here, I confine myself to a discussion of Lutzoni's assessment of

Combinability of Phylogenies and Bootstrap Confidence Envelopes