English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper reports on a project in which part-time doctoral researchers were engaged in a process of peer assessment and review, with a view to improving their critical writing skills. Our aim was to support the development of students’ critical writing skills by involving them in giving and receiving formative, peer feedback over a sustained period. The intervention was launched with a three-day residential programme during which participants attended workshops on critical writing, took part in peer assessment activities, and set up an editorial board for an online journal. Run entirely by and for doctoral students, the journal continued to flourish for over three years, during which time the participants were continuously engaged in writing, editing, and peer reviewing. We report here on students’ perceptions of the impact of their sustained, long-term involvement in the work of the editorial board, including writing and peer reviewing, and we consider the implications of the findings for doctoral programmes.

Creating dialogic spaces: developing doctoral students’ critical writing skills through peer assessment and review