English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Education is a well-known correlate of many political attitudes and behaviors. Despite the concept’s ubiquitous use by researchers, however, few studies take seriously the question of how it should be operationalized. Measures of  level  of education are used inconsistently and coding decisions are rarely justified. More importantly, the relationship between the  field  of education and important outcome variables have been completely overlooked in Canada. That is, while researchers are aware that the amount of education one receives matters, they ignore the question of how the subject of that education might matter. We address these issues here, using data from over 4,000 Canadians to consider in detail the relationship between the level and field of education upon two important outcomes: turnout and partisanship. We conclude that measures of level of education should be as detailed as possible, and that the field of study, in particular, has significant effects.

Post-Secondary Education and Canadian Political Behavior: How are the Level and Field of Study related to Turnout and Partisanship?