English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The current research sought to explore the utility of the Assessment for Intervention (AFI) model in bridging the gap between assessment and intervention, through the conceptual lens of Bio-Ecological Systems Theory (BEST) and Social Constructivist Theory (SCT). AFI is a five-stage assessment model that aims to provide useful and evidence-based recommendations. An exploratory ‘two case’ case study was employed and the AFI framework was applied to two case referrals made to a school psychological service in Ireland. A pilot study was conducted to inform the research design. Participants rated Likert statements exploring case propositions, before and after application of the AFI model. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted. Thematic analysis and pattern-matching were employed to analyse interview data. The findings suggest the AFI model, grounded in BEST and SCT, can address the gap between assessment and intervention, discussed in the literature. Implications for policy and practice in educational psychology are discussed.

An exploration of the assessment for intervention model in an Irish educational psychological context