English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Controversy still exists with regard to the prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in ovarian cancer. A systematic search based on the databases of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Dataset were conducted up to March 22, 2022. We included both retrospective and prospective observational studies with comparison of prognosis of patients who were divided into two groups: low and high PNI group. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied to evaluate the quality of enrolled studies. All analyses were performed using Stata software. The pooled results were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Finally, 12 studies involving 3,190 patients were included. High PNI group had a significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53–0.84), progression-free survival (PFS, HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63–0.87), and cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20–0.94) compared with the low PNI group. The sensitivity analysis and publication bias indicated our results were reliable. PNI could be applied as a promising index to predict prognosis in ovarian cancer. Our results need to be validated in future studies.

The Prognostic Value of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis