English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this paper is two-fold: Firstly, it reports on one man’s experience of bulimia. After being interviewed it became evident that he did not meet the inclusion criteria for the study, which was focussed on anorexia in men. Secondly, the paper explores the implications for a novice researcher of including someone in a study who does not meet the inclusion criteria. The researcher’s story reflects upon the implications of self-doubt when embarking upon sensitive research, and the morality of holding onto a rogue participant’s story. It offers others an opportunity to consider and learn from this experience.

A Tale of Two Stories: A Narrative of Bulimia in a Research Study of Anorexia, and the Dilemmas of a Novice Researcher