English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this prospective case study was to explore clients’ and social network members’ responses to participating in a newly implemented Open Dialogue approach in an Australian early intervention in psychosis treatment context. We followed four clients’ trajectories through treatment by drawing on data from electronic medical record entries, observed or audio-recorded network meetings, and client and family interviews. Data were analysed thematically. Clients and families generally appreciated the Open Dialogue approach, even though it created hard practical and psychosocial work for them before, during and in between meetings. We discuss the increased workload as responsibilization of families.

Client and Family Responses to an Open Dialogue Approach in Early Intervention in Psychosis: A Prospective Qualitative Case Study