English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Several passive techniques can substantially improve the heat transfer performance of conventional heat exchangers. Passive methods persistently use heat transfer augmentation inside tubular sections, which tackle dominant thermal resistance. The thermal resistance in turbulent flow is primarily due to a thin viscous sublayer near the tube wall. This proliferates into the cross-section of the conduit in the case of laminar flows due to the existence of a relatively thicker boundary layer. This urges disturbance in the entire fluid throughout the cross-section in laminar flows, whereas augmentation devices are usually located close to the wall for turbulent flows. Most of these methods yield increased fluid residence time within the system by inducing swirling motion. The form of disturbance in the flow field is the characteristic of the passive technique used to prolong the fluid residence time and is exhibited differently in both flow regimes. The present article showcases a comprehensive review of heat transfer enhancement through thermo hydraulic performance assessment of these methods reported in the literature. The comparison is based on ratios of Nusselt numbers, first at the same Reynolds numbers, and then, at equal pumping power with constant heat transfer area.

heat transfer engineering

A Comprehensive Compendium on Passive Augmentation Techniques for Enhancement of Single-Phase Heat Transfer Coefficients in Heat Exchanger Tubes under Laminar and Turbulent Flow Conditions