English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The performance of precise point positioning (PPP) mainly depends on satellite orbit and clock accuracy. Ultra-rapid and rapid orbit/clock products have been creating by analysis centres (ACs) for time-critical applications. In this paper, GPS-, GLONASS-, Galileo-, and BeiDou (BDS-2)-only PPP with ultra-rapid and rapid products from seven ACs (i.e. CODE, ESA, IGS, GFZ, JPL, NRCan, and WUHAN) are investigated for PPP performance. A two-month period in 2020 was chosen for conducting static and kinematic PPP using data from 32 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations. For GPS-only PPP with different ACs, GFZ/NRCan and CODE/NRCan rank first for ultra-rapid and rapid PPP processes, respectively. For GLONASS-only PPP, positioning performances using ultra-rapid products are comparable with each other except for CODE and ESA products. CODE rapid product ranks last for GLONASS-only PPP. For Galileo and BeiDou-only PPP, GFZ AC performs the best for ultra-rapid processes. For Galileo-only PPP using rapid products, CODE ranks first.

Assessment of the GNSS PPP performance using ultra-rapid and rapid products from different analysis centres