English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The suffix - ful , in words like  hopeful  and  wonderful , originates in the adjective  full , from whence it seems to have undergone grammaticalisation. In Present-day English, the morphological differences between these two items are marked by their orthography: in addition to losing its free-word status, - ful  also simplified the digraph &lt;ll&gt; to &lt;l&gt;. Although the current orthographic configuration of these items reveals the interplay between spelling and morphology, there arise some questions regarding the process leading up to it, especially when considering the orthographic instability of the Middle and Early Modern periods. This article thus studies the selection of the spelling variants &lt;full&gt; and &lt;ful&gt; over time in order to shed some light on their distribution and standardisation. Adopting a corpus-based approach that draws data from the  Helsinki Corpus of English Texts , the analyses of intra- and extralinguistic phenomena ultimately point to speakers as the enablers of regularisation in this very instance.

Order out of Chaos: The Orthographic Standardisation of full and - ful