English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In a commentary on our recently published article in PNAS (1), demonstrating that scientists pose strong self-enhancing biases when requested to evaluate their contribution to published team work, Herschlag (2) extends the discussion and proposes potential explanations for these observed biases. We enjoyed reading Herschlag’s examples and insights and think that this kind of discussion is paramount for raising awareness of this important issue.We also agree with Herschlag (2) that some elements of contribution to collaborative science … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: herz.noa{at}gmail.com. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

Reply to Herschlag: Enhancing integrative science by acknowledging our biases