English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There is ongoing debate regarding the mechanism through which cation/proton antiporters (CPAs), like Thermus thermophilus NapA (TtNapA) and Escherichia coli NapA (EcNhaA), alternate between their outward- and inward-facing conformations in the membrane. CPAs comprise two domains, and it is unclear whether the transition is driven by their rocking-bundle or elevator motion with respect to each other. Here we address this question using metadynamics simulations of TtNapA, where we bias conformational sampling along two axes characterizing the two proposed mechanisms: angular and translational motions, respectively. By applying the bias potential for the two axes simultaneously, as well as to the angular, but not the translational, axis alone, we manage to reproduce each of the two known states of TtNapA when starting from the opposite state, in support of the rocking-bundle mechanism as the driver of conformational change. Next, starting from the inward-facing conformation of EcNhaA, we sample what could be its long-sought-after outward-facing conformation and verify it using cross-linking experiments.

An angular motion of a conserved four-helix bundle facilitates alternating access transport in the TtNapA and EcNhaA transporters