English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Pincheira-Donoso and Hodgson (1) discuss vertebrate endangerment patterns in their response to our recent article (2). They reassessed our conclusion of a bimodal body size distribution of endangerment for all vertebrates but did so using only data on body mass for amphibians. In our study, we collectively analyzed patterns of endangerment across six classes of vertebrates. Contrasting patterns specific to amphibians with results that pertain to all vertebrates fails to compare like to like and as such is perhaps an exercise of unclear value. Pincheira-Donoso and Hodgson (1) suggest that our vertebrate model is inadequate because “increases in endangerment of smaller vertebrates are heavily biased by a single class (Amphibia) . . . ” We investigated this potential bias by refitting our vertebrate model without amphibians … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: bill.ripple{at}oregonstate.edu. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

Reply to Pincheira-Donoso and Hodgson: Both the largest and smallest vertebrates have elevated extinction risk