English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We welcome the response by Fattorini et al. (1), which opens up discussion on the many possible factors influencing how children use their local environments. Fattorini et al. argue that our study (2) fails to test the biophilia hypothesis by leaving untested a possible cultural influence for children to prefer formal gardens over wild and natural spaces. We believe that our conclusion that children’s selection of habitats does not conform to the biophilia hypothesis is valid; children did not behave as predicted by this hypothesis, as they avoided the most biodiverse spaces, typically the more natural and wild environments. That current human culture …

Reply to Fattorini et al.: Children’s selected avoidance of wild greenspace is driven by more than cultural factors