English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Lynch and Marinov (1) challenge our findings (2) that mitochondria are essential to the prokaryote−eukaryote transition. Their paper states: “Lane and Martin introduced the cost of a gene as an argument for the impossibility of high levels of cellular/developmental complexity without a power-generating mitochondrion.” Scrutinizing bioenergetic costs, they conclude that “an energetic boost associated with the emergence of the mitochondrion was not a precondition for eukaryotic genome expansion” (1). In fact, our paper (2) was not about the bioenergetic costs of a gene at all. We considered energy availability per gene: supply, not demand. Lynch and Marinov (1) fail to consider supply. Their calculations …

Mitochondria, complexity, and evolutionary deficit spending