English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We report that, for severe hurricanes, name femininity predicts more fatalities (1). Maley (2) argues that outliers drive this effect and that their inland fatalities are not relevant. These arguments reflect misunderstandings about hurricane impacts and their analysis. Maley examines main effects of male/female names. However, our hypothesis addresses the interaction between name femininity (continuous) and hurricane severity (normalized damage). Maley uses deaths as the indicator of storm severity; however, deaths are the outcome and not a predictor. He concludes that only four hurricanes were severe, noting that they accounted for many deaths. This distribution of observations is actually typical of count data. Enumerated events (e.g., measles cases per county), or counts, …

Reply to Maley: Yes, appropriate modeling of fatality counts confirms female hurricanes are deadlier