English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Eens et al.(1) question (i) whether our data are sufficient to state that low-frequency songs are sexually selected and (ii) whether anthropogenic noise really affects male–female communication, as males may just get closer to make their songs more audible. In reply to the first criticism, we do not see any reason in their arguments that would raise doubts about whether our statistical reality is reflecting a biological reality. We performed an adequate test on 22 male great tits and found cuckolded males to sing higher-frequency songs compared with noncuckolded males(2). Furthermore, although we could not assign the genetic fathers for all chicks in our study, …

Reply to Eens et al.: Urban noise can alter sexual selection on bird song