English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A possible neurobiological basis for the "oblique effect" is linked to the finding that more neural machinery is devoted to processing cardinal vs. oblique orientations in primary visual cortex (V1). We used optical imaging to determine whether more territory is devoted to processing horizontal and vertical orientations than oblique orientations in owl monkey middle temporal visual area (MT), a visual area highly sensitive to moving stimuli. We found that more of MT was devoted to representing cardinal than oblique orientations, and that the anisotropy was more prominent in parts of MT representing central vision (&lt; or =10 degrees). Neural responses to orientations of 0 degrees and 90 degrees were also greater than those to 45 degrees and 135 degrees . In comparison, an overrepresentation of cardinal orientations in the representation of central vision in owl monkey V1 was relatively small and inconsistent. Our data could explain the greater sensitivity to motion discrimination when stimuli are moved along cardinal meridians and suggest that the neural machinery necessary to explain the motion oblique effect either originates in MT or is enhanced at this level.

Unequal representation of cardinal vs. oblique orientations in the middle temporal visual area