English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective The effective utilization of intern training for ophthalmology residency is undermined by its variability across postgraduate programs. As residency programs shift toward integrating the first postgraduate year (PGY-1) into the ophthalmology-training curriculum, there are no definitive guidelines to build upon.  Methods This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of new second postgraduate year (PGY-2) ophthalmology residents. Residents were surveyed in their first 2 months of ophthalmology training. Residents were asked to self-assess preparedness for ophthalmology based on their PGY-1 curriculum. A survey was composed and modified from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's assessment of resident training. The Wilcoxon's rank-sum test was used to evaluate survey differences between the transitional year (TY) versus preliminary internal medicine (IM) year and compare survey responses between residents who were below versus above optimal cut points for weeks of ophthalmic training.  Results There were 72 PGY-2 residents who responded to blinded surveys collected from July to August of 2017 and 2018. Thirty-nine (54%) residents graduated from a TY, 28 (39%) from preliminary IM, 3 (4%) from preliminary surgery, and 2 (3%) from a categorical ophthalmology year. Both categorical ophthalmology and surgery year were excluded from training year comparison due to low sample size. Using weeks of ophthalmology training as the control variable, there were significant increases in preparedness for addressing the ophthalmic complaint (p = 0.003) with at least 8 weeks of clinical ophthalmology, ability to perform ophthalmic exam (p = 0.018) with at least 12 weeks, ophthalmology medical knowledge (p = 0.005) with at least 10 weeks, and proficiency with hospital electronic health record (p = 0.003) with at least 12 weeks.  Conclusion While our study did not find significant differences in perceived preparedness for ophthalmology residency based on the type of PGY-1 programs completed, there were statistically significant associations for specific ophthalmology tasks. These findings suggested a potential merit of integrating 12 weeks of clinical ophthalmology training as a benchmark for resident preparedness.

Exploring the Benefit of an Integrated Ophthalmology Internship (PGY-1)—Perceived Preparedness and the Recommended Duration of Training