English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The free radial forearm flap remains aworkhorseflap for head and neck reconstruction, although perforator flap or super microsurgery has become increasingly popular. Yet donorsite morbidities, including unsightly appearances that may occur when sites are closed via skin graft, cause reconstructive surgeons to be hesitant to use the forearm flap. Elliot et al (1988) reported the direct closure method for donor-site defects of the radial forearm flap using the V–Y flap, and several modifications have been reported based on their methods.1–8However, partial skin necrosis sometimes occurs along the lateral side of the flap even though the perforators from ulnar artery are preserved well, and this necrosis leaves ugly wide scarring on patients’ forearms (►Fig. 1). To minimize these drawbacks, simple lazy S double-opposing rotation flaps were designed for the donor site of the radial forearm flap, and the donor-site defect was closed directly. In this report, the details of the method and the outcomes are described. Materials and Methods

An Alternative Method of the Direct Closure for the Radial Forearm Flap Donor-Site Defect: Lazy S Double-Opposing Rotation Flaps