English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The instruments of pretrial arrangements prescribed in the Criminal Procedure Code are insufficient to regulate pretrial mechanisms in practice. The problems in question are related to the pretrial examination period. Pretrial shall be carried out speedily within seven days at the latest or pretrial examination should be stopped if the first examination of the subject matter commenced. In conjunction with a criminal justice system, the pretrial and subject matter examination system are different and separate sub-systems, although integrated in a series of criminal justice systems. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the pretrial termination due to the examination of the subject matter is appropriate according to criminal justice system perspective. This research is a doctrinal research with the statute approach and conceptual approach, by reviewing the pretrial arrangement relating to the concept of criminal justice system. Examination at the pretrial and the subject matter are two different and separate sub-systems. They should not exclude each other, the examination of subject matter should not the pretrial process, or the subject matter examination cannot be started before pretrial verdict have passed.

Termination of Pretrial Process upon Commencement of the Subject Matter in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System Perspective