English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Due to problems that have occurred during the conversion of the article into PDF format, and the resulting loss of many special characters, a new correct version of the article is published below. In the frame of the European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP)-funded joint research project “Implementing the new kelvin” one work package is devoted to the assessment of two different methods of dissemination of the thermodynamic temperature. These two methods are the dissemination via high temperature fixed points (HTFP) with assigned thermodynamic temperatures and the dissemination by radiometers or radiation thermometers calibrated in terms of thermodynamic temperature. To achieve a thorough assessment of these two distinct dissemination methods two dissemination exercises were organised in the form of comparisons. In one case the circulating artefacts were off-the-shelf high-temperature fixed point cells with transition temperatures ranging from 1324 °C to 2474 °C, in the other case absolutely calibrated pyrometers and filter radiometers were compared in the temperature range 1000 °C to 2500 °C. This work showed that both schemes offered suitable routes for dissemination with competing advantages and drawbacks and would most probably help disseminating thermodynamic temperature in the future at the level of 1 K to 2 K uncertainty over the whole temperature range.

Erratum to: Experimental assessment of thermodynamic temperature dissemination methods at the highest temperatures