English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study explores the influence of different fluids in a uniform micro-channel geometry on conjugate heat transfer. Nanofluids used here, are SiO 2  and Al 2 O 3  nanoparticles with various concentrations up to 4% in water as a base fluid under laminar flow. Nanofluids are compared to an ionic liquid called Butyl Methyl Imidazolium Tetrafluroborate (BMIM BF 4 ) to examine the influence of heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics. Good agreement was found against previous micro-channel studies, numerical simulations with COMSOL Multiphysics® V5.2a are used at Reynolds number ranging from 50 to1000 with a uniform heat flux of 100 W/cm 2  relevent to cooling systems. Advanced fluids might offer significant potential in combatting the challenges of heat transfer in the technological drive toward lower weight/smaller volume electrical and electronic devices. The results show that the lowest thermal resistance is for nanofluids followed by water, then the ionic liquid. Moreover, Al 2 O 3 -water offers lower thermal resistance than the SiO 2 -water for all given nanoparticle concentrations. It is also found that there is no beneficial using ionic liquids in forced convection systems which work below boiling temperature conditions.

Do ionic liquids replace water or nanofluids to enhance heat transfer in micro-channel systems?