English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper comes back on the accuracy of the  surrogate-reaction method  (SRM) historically used for neutron-induced average partial cross sections inference from measured surrogate-reaction probabilities. The SRM level of performance is examined in relation to a reasonably accurate reference calculation performed with the  ℱ-ℒ  code [1] through a challenging test case : the  240 Pu* compound system. This paper argues on some ingredients of the reference calculation [2] and returns some hints about the failure now well-known of the neutron-induced  γ  average cross section inference. It shows also that in some special cases, the SRM can be poorly accurate also in terms of neutron-induced fission average cross section inference.

Monte Carlo simulation of γ and fission transfer reactions using extended ℛ-matrix theory