English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

It has been suggested that the complexing type of inactivation in which the inactivator binds reversibly with the enzyme before inactivation cannot be differentiated kinetically from that a slow enzyme conformation change is involved as a first step [Rakitzis (1986) J. Theor. Biol. 122, 247-249]. The kinetics of the substrate reaction during modification of enzyme activity previously described [Tsou (1988) Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 61, 381-436] have now been applied to this problem and equations derived to show that the slow-conformational-change type can be differentiated from the complexing type by plotting the final concentration of product formed, [P]infinity, against the reciprocal of inactivator concentration. The reaction of hexokinase with 2-chloromercuri-4-nitrophenol has been shown to involve a conformational change of the enzyme before inactivation.

Kinetic differentiation between enzyme inactivation involving complex-formation with the inactivator and that involving a conformation-change step