English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The diverse methodologies and myriad orthogonal proposals for the besttechnosignatures to search for in SETI can make it difficult to develop aneffective and balanced search strategy, especially from a funding perspective.Here I propose a framework to compare the relative advantages and disadvantagesof various proposed technosignatures based on nine "axes of merit". Thisframework was first developed at the NASA Technosignatures Workshop in Houstonin 2018 and published in that report. I give the definition and rationalebehind the nine axes as well as the history of each axis in the SETI andtechnosignature literature. These axes are then applied to three exampleclasses of technosignature searches as an illustration of their use. Anopen-source software tool is available to allow technosignature researchers tomake their own version of the figure.

The Nine Axes of Merit for Technosignature Searches