English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Capitalist systems are private­ownership systems distinguished by openness to implementing new commercial ideas – ideas for new products and methods – and by decentralized, pluralistic mechanisms for selecting the ideas to finance and providing the needed capital and incentives. The economic system in the U.S. is broadly of that type. The sort of system in continental western Europe is so constrained by institutions and regulations intended for the protection of stakeholders and " social partners " that it goes by other names – corporatism or the social market economy. China's system must be called " state capitalism " because its financial sector is state­run. How these three systems affect innovation and economic performance is a topic of lively discussion today. To many proponents – Schumpeter, for example – and critics – Marx, for one – capitalism's strength is its dynamism – the readiness and adeptness with which it moves forward. No doubt this dynamism derives in part from the creativity of business people and the acuity of the financiers judging which entrepreneurial ideas to back. 1 Yet our understanding of the mechanisms and economic institutions involved, and why capitalism's dynamism is apparently hard to match, has not advanced far since the seminal insights of the early modern theorists of capitalism – notably Knight, Hayek and M. Polanyí. I first review their legacy, which is not widely known. I then sketch elements of a model building on their insights, examine some of its implications and discuss recent and postwar experience from its perspective. A student relying on secondary sources might surmise that the theory of capitalism's dynamism originates in the classical case for competitive markets – a case first made by Adam Smith two centuries ago. This classical thesis was that the presence of many buyers and sellers competing with one another Columbia University. Max Amarante and Hian Teck Hoon have collaborated with me on aspects of this paper. The research for this paper has been made possible by a grant from the Kauffman Foundation. 1 Capitalism also has a reputation for instability, thus job insecurity, and for incomplete inclusion of the disadvantaged. These issues are outside the scope of the present paper however. (I would comment only that the capitalist economies have done better at job creation and inclusion than the corporatist economies have.)

Toward a Model of Innovation and Performance Along the Lines of Knight, Keynes, Hayek, and M. Polanyí