English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Introduction: Given the increased number of choices for performing a prostate biopsy, we recently reported an analysis of the cost implications, with the key findings (compared to reference transrectal ultrasound [TRUS] biopsy under local anesthesia): TRUS/IV sedation =1.9x more expensive, transperineal (TP)/general anesthesia 2.5x, MRI-Fusion/IV sedation 2.5x, and In-Bore-MRI/IV sedation =2.3x. In this study, we captured a representative sample of these cases to add the important layer of complication rates, as they add to the total cost.

MP82-11 COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES AFTER 4 DIFFERENT PROSTATE BIOPSY TECHNIQUES: A FOCUS ON STANDARDIZED COMPLICATION REPORTING