English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Diagnostic confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 by self-collection of specimens is a reliable method compared to healthcare worker collected samples. Citizen's preferences for collection method are unknown, but at-home collection could have several advantages.MethodsThis study investigated the preference for guided at-home self-collection versus at-hospital specimen collection by healthcare workers.ResultsAmong the 3,709 participants, an at-home swab collection was the preferred setting for 2,362 (63.7%), as compared with 1,347 (36.3%) reporting a preference for an at-hospital swab procedure.ConclusionA high preference for guided at-home self-collection of oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 Specimen exists and could be a future norm beyond COVID-19.

Danish citizens’ preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection