English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper, the peak stress method (PSM) is adopted to analyse the fatigue strength of steel welded joints. According to this method, a single design curve is expressed in terms of a properly defined equivalent peak stress and it is valid for fatigue design of arc-welded steel joints. Private companies often need simple finite element beam models for fatigue strength assessments, because of the large dimensions of the structures. However, beam elements provide nominal stresses (and not local stresses) that must be compared with appropriate fatigue strength values (the FAT classes) available in design standards. Due to the limited number of FAT classes available, finding the appropriate one is frequently troublesome, particularly when complex geometries are considered. The objective of this work is to define FAT classes in terms of nominal stress for a number of geometrically complex structural details, starting from the design curve of the PSM. FAT classes have also been determined using the hot spot stress approach. Then the results obtained with the two methods are compared. The structural details analysed in the present paper are typically adopted in amusement park structures and are not classified in common design standards.

Fat classes of welded steel details derived from the master design curve of the peak stress method