English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We present a commentary on the inclusion criteria and outcome measures of the major randomized trials on multiple sclerosis. A qualitative comparison of the characteristics of the enrolled patients is done. The objective is to stimulate a discussion about the need to improve research strategies. The discovery of new drugs studied without personalized criteria does not allow for useful advances in knowledge.

Pivotal Trials in Multiple Sclerosis: Similarities Prove Not to Be Useful