English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This comment addresses the work of Wang and Li (DOI: 10.1007/s12293-009-0012-0, hereafter referred to as WL) published online on September 01, 2009 in a (special) issue of Memetic Computing. We respectfully beg to differ in opinion with WL and argue that the concept of multi-strategy evolutionary search used by WL is not particularly novel. Similar ideas have been presented elsewhere, and these publications date back to at least early 2007. For instance, in a series of papers published in PNAS (2007), SSSAJ (2008), WRR (2008), IEEE-TEVC (2009), JH (2010), Vrugt and coworkers have introduced AMALGAM, a multi-method (or ensemble) search approach to solve emerging single and multiple objective search and optimization problems. In the past few years, MATLAB, C++, Python, and R implementations of AMALGAM have been distributed extensively among researchers and practitioners in various fields of study.

Comment on paper “Multi-strategy ensemble evolutionary algorithm for dynamic multi-objective optimization” by Wang and Li