English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Unfortunately, the two sentences mentioned below were incorrect in the original publication. The penultimate sentence in Section 1 (Context/Motivation) should read as follows: “Results are presented in Sect. 5 firstly comparing performances when different fittingness functions are used, and secondly assessing the impact of the proposed decision-making criteria.” The penultimate sentence in the second paragraph of Section 5.1 (Simulation Model) should read as follows: “Based on these probabilities, the average durations of the high interference state for pools #3 and #4 are 0.5 h and 2 min, respectively, while the average durations of the low interference state for pools #3 and #4 are 7.5 h and 0.5 h, respectively.”

Erratum to: A Fittingness Factor-Based Spectrum Management Framework for Cognitive Radio Networks